 |
Anonymous' Debates
  |
Australian Aboriginals would be better off if white people never came to Australia
This is to all those who have been saying that Prime Minister Rudd shouldn't have said sorry to the Aboriginals for the Stolen Generation because "without us, they wouldn't have clean water, houses, jobs, money etc." My argument is that if we'd never invaded (yep, that's what we did - it's hard to 'discover' something that's been inhabited for 50000 years...) Australia, the Aboriginals would still be blissful in their ignorance of white people's existance and all these so-called luxuries they...
Congress and the white house should be devoid of politicians.
What I am saying is that instead of putting politicians and (ok lets be honest) upper class, well educated, IVY league sons of past politicians into office, we should let everyday normal people run, and we should provide a forum for anyone to do so without hundreds of thousands of dollars from corporate sponsors and lobbyists. Anyone could run initially, then they would be filtered down by an expedient process of elimination. Sure, elections would take much longer, but we would end up with peopl...
Bush used classic bait-and-switch manipulation to get our country into Iraq
I will present basic steps in bait-and-switch sales tactics, followed by the corresponding action on the Bush Administration. First, the salesman must have a desire to sell a product. -Bush's desire to sell the "War on Terror" is nothing short of legend. The salesman uses fraudulent means (bait) to get the customer into the store, with no intention of holding his/her original promise. This usually takes the form of a sale of some sort, with the marketing of a product that is very cheap an...
The concept of intelligent design should be taught alongside evolution as an equally valid idea.
Let me start by clearly stating that I am trying to show that intelligent design is just as likely (if not much more likely) from a scientific viewpoint as the theory of randomness...err, I'm sorry, the theory of evolution. You will notice that I said intelligent design, not Christianity or any specific religion, although studying writings such as the Bible, the Quran and etc. would prevent alot of the ignorance we see in many people when it comes to the many different texts regarded as scrip...
Our constitution has been raped, and we might as well write a new one simply saying "screw God".
Seperation of Church and state never existed in our constitution, it was a term coined by Thomas Jefferson in a letter he wrote to congress, and he was referring to the state controlling peoples religion. Nowhere in our constitution, or in that letter, does it say anything about our governments ability or lack thereof to engage in, endorse, facilitate, or in any way be involved with any religion whatsoever. Our nation's founding fathers WERE Christians, and while we weren't founded as a Christia...
Intelligent Design should be taught alongside evolution as an equally valid idea.
Let me start by clearly stating that I am trying to show that intelligent design is just as likely (if not much more likely) from a scientific viewpoint as the theory of randomness...err, I'm sorry, the theory of evolution. You will notice that I said intelligent design, not Christianity or any specific religion, although studying writings such as the Bible, the Quran and etc. would prevent alot of the ignorance we see in many people when it comes to the many different texts regarded as scrip...
media should have the right to expression
i strongly feel that media should have the right to expression as media is the network which enables us with the happening of the world..and if we are taking away the right to expression we are actually destroying the purpose of its existence....
The Bible proves there is a God.
The_conservative contended that the Bible proves there is a God. He did not care to back that statement up or demonstrate his reasoning for believing such. He declined my invite so I'm opening it up to everybody. Care to back that statement up? I contend that that statement is absolutely wrong....
Women are the more sexually driven gender.
I will be arguing that women are the more sexually driven gender. The polar opposite of this argument therefore, is to say that men are the more sexually driven gender (women are not the most sexually gender, thus leaving males to be) and will expect my opponent to argue as such. It'd be great if they could be a female, as they will surely have a deeper insight into this topic more so than another male. Women are the more sexually driven gender. By this, I mean they present themselves in more...
News channels have changed their subject material from serious news to celebrity "glamour" news.
Keeping opening arguments short, I would like to clarify my statement. Especially today news, the mornign news show, used to host serious pieces like avionics and heartwarming stories about animals. Now it is stories about Britney Spears and celebrity mishaps. I believe this is wrong and would like to debate someone on this. Good luck to my acceptant....