Sedo - Buy and Sell Domain Names and Websites project info: debate.com Statistics for project debate.com etracker® web controlling instead of log file analysis
Online:2 Weeks Ago Name:- Private -
Updated:1 Year Ago Gender:Male
Joined:1 Year Ago Birthday:- Private -
President:Not Saying Email:- Private -
Ideology:Not Saying Education:Not Saying
Party:Not Saying Ethnicity:Not Saying
Relationship:Not Saying Income:Not Saying
Interested:No Answer Occupation:Not Saying
Looking:No Answer Religion:Not Saying

Is God's existence evidentially likely or unlikely?

Derrida
Kleptin

I have finally decided to debate my own views and opinions on the nature of God. I will be taking the position that the classical theistic God (Omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent) probably does not exist given the balance of evidence. I would suggest to my opponent that the first round is used only to present opening arguments, the second for objections, the third for counter-objections, and the final round for closing statements or final objections. However, if my opponent chooses oth...

Voting Period
14 Comments
Updated 11 Months Ago

Intelligent Design Is Not Science

Derrida
olle15

My Argument is that Intelligent Design is not science, and so shouldn't be given the same treatment as science, i.e. shouldn't be taught as a scientific theory, shouldn't be debated in scientific journals or given scientific research grants by the government etc... For my position, I will put forward 2 arguments: 1) Intelligent Design is wrong; there is no reason to believe that the theory of ID has any weight, and as such should be discarded along with Lamarckian evolution and geocentrici...

Voting Period
13 Comments
Updated 11 Months Ago

It is not reasonable to believe in God

Derrida
impactyourworld89

Take 2 My argument is basically this: 1) There is no evidence for the existence of God. (Assumed premiss to be argued about during the debate) 2) If there is no evidence for the existence of x, then there is no reason to believe in the existence of x. (I will put an argument forth in the next paragraph) C) There is no reason to believe in God. (From 1 and 2) God is here defined as a personal, supernatural creator of the universe. When I say that there is no evidence for the...

Voting Period
8 Comments
Updated 11 Months Ago

There is no reason to believe in God

Derrida
Jziggy

My argument is basically this: 1) There is no evidence for the existence of God. (Assumed premiss to be argued about during the debate) 2) If there is no evidence for the existence of x, then there is no reason to believe in the existence of x. (I will put an argument forth in the next paragraph) C) There is no reason to believe in God. (From 1 and 2) God is here defined as a personal, supernatural creator of the universe. When I say that there is no evidence for the existence...

Voting Period
21 Comments
Updated 11 Months Ago

Do all atheists go to Hell?

Derrida
Kleptin

Pascal's Wager states that theism is a better position than atheism, the denial of the existence of God, because if God exists then He sends atheists to Hell and the loss is infinite. I believe that an argument can be leveled at the premiss that if God exists then He sends atheists to Hell. The argument, if valid, proves that it is never justified in sending someone to Hell for the sole reason that they are atheists. The argument is this: Atheists are either what I would call Rational A...

Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 11 Months Ago
Derrida
Debates:7
Lost:0
Tied:1
Won:6
Win Ratio:100.00%
Percentile:92.81%
Statistics based on completed debates.
0 Friends
Derrida does not have any Debate.com friends.
Derrida has not added any photo albums.