| Online: | Right Now | Name: | - Private - | |
| Updated: | 4 Days Ago | Gender: | Male | |
| Joined: | 12 Months Ago | Birthday: | August 3, 1989 | |
| President: | Other | Email: | - Private - | |
| Ideology: | Libertarian | Education: | Some College | |
| Party: | Not Saying | Ethnicity: | White | |
| Relationship: | Single | Income: | Not Saying | |
| Interested: | in Women | Occupation: | Student | |
| Looking: | Friendship, Dating, A Relationship | Religion: | Atheist |
| About Me: | I don't know why you'd want to concern yourself with this. If you do, ask me a question. Oh, and maybe so I repeat myself a little less, I CANNOT VOTE ON THIS WEBSITE NOOBS. My "looking" status is as it is primarily due to the requirement to be honest about keeping my eyes open. It does not go to the extent of bending my neck often :D |
| Beliefs: | I am an Objectivist, though more aligned with the David Kelley/TAS faction than the Leonard Peikoff/ARI faction. For those unfamiliar with this, it means, in short, that in matters of ultimate reality, what you see is what you get; that reasoning from experience and the abstractions made from experience is the root of all knowledge; that man exists for his own sake (i.e. one's own life is an end in itself), and that the only societal arrangement compatible with these statements is the free market- the prohibition of non-retaliatory force and fraud against persons and their property from human relations. |
| Books: | Atlas Shrugged, the Wheel of Time series, the Sword of Truth series. |
| Music: | Metallica, Megadeth, Black Sabbath, Nine Inch Nails, Sergei Rachmaninov |
| Quotes: | " The verdict you pronounce upon the source of your livelihood (money) is the verdict you pronounce upon your life. If the source is corrupt, you have damned your own existence."--Atlas Shrugged |
| Sports Teams: | Minnesota Vikings |
You slice the cake, I'll pick the first piece
The above is not the actual resolution I am debating, it is a metaphor that sets the terms of this challenge.. My opponent shall write the resolution, any resolution they please. I then choose which position on it I will argue (So I may or may not be the actual "Pro" in this debate). So, I advise you to only accept this debate if A. You are a traditional debate wonk who is willing to argue any position, or B. you are quite sure the resolution is one on which I'll actually disagree with you on (m...
I will not break a rule.
0. By accepting this debate, my opponent agrees to all the rulse already posted. This debate poses off of another debate that was quite comical to me. 1. Rules created hold power over all rules posted later, and no later rule can contradict an earlier rule. 2. Both players should still have the ability to post rules in their turn. 3. A violation of a rule that is not null and void will result in the rule-breaker losing this debate. 4. A player may only do something besides make rule...
The U.S. Constitution Should be Amended to Limit Judicial Activism
Currently, the Constitution does not specify how disputes over Constitutional rights should be resolved. It neither states the criteria for resolving them or the mechanism for the resolution. By tradition the Supreme Court resolves the issues using whatever criteria pleases them. The point of having a written constitution is to have laws prevail over men, so the ambiguity over the criteria and method is a serious defect that should be remedied. The Constitution should be amended to establish...
Should church owners be able to evade taxes?
I believe it's wrong. Opposition? Go first...
The Apocalypse will be seen in this life time
First I would like to explain the rules for this debate. each person will have 3 days to post. a very good amount of time to find anything they need to fight his/her argument. secondly, lets define Apocalypse, shall we? [Definition]#1 Great or total devastation; doom: the apocalypse of nuclear war. #2 A prophetic disclosure; a revelation. Thus meaning that humans do not need to be killed off for an Apocalypse to happen, and in no way am I saying(if humans are killed off) nothing else w...
Add as a Friend
Add to My Favorites
Block this Person
Challenge to a Debate
Report this Profile
Send a Message
Share with My Friends
| Debate Statistics | |
| Debates: | 86 |
| Lost: | 30 |
| Tied: | 1 |
| Won: | 55 |
| Win Ratio: | 64.71% |
| Percentile: | 99.86% |
| • | Abortion | |
| • | Affirmative Action | Con |
| • | Border Fence | Con |
| • | Campaign Finance Reform | Con |
| • | Civil Unions | |
| • | Death Penalty | Pro |
| • | Drug Legalization | |
| • | Environmental Protection | |
| • | Estate Tax | Con |
| • | Euthanasia | |
| • | Flag Burning | Pro |
| • | Flat Tax | |
| • | Gay Marriage | |
| • | Global Warming Exists | |
| • | Gun Rights | Pro |
| • | Labor Unions | |
| • | Late Term Abortion | Pro |
| • | Medicaid & Medicare | Con |
| • | Medical Marijuana | Pro |
| • | Minimum Wage | Con |
| • | Missile Defense System | Und |
| • | NAFTA | |
| • | National Health Care | Con |
| • | National Retail Sales Tax | Con |
| • | Patriotism | Con |
| • | PETA | Con |
| • | Police Profiling | Con |
| • | President George W. Bush | Con |
| • | Progressive Tax | Con |
| • | School Vouchers | |
| • | Social Programs | Con |
| • | Social Security | Con |
| • | Term Limits | Con |
| • | Tobacco Rights | |
| • | United Nations | |
| • | United States | |
| • | War in Afghanistan | |
| • | War in Iran | |
| • | War in Iraq | |
| • | War on Terrorism | |
| • | Water Boarding | |
| • | Welfare | Con |
| • | World Trade Organization |