 |
Spiral's Debates
  |
People with learning disabilities should not use the Tube during peak periods.
Whilst I am renowned for my compassion and respect for flids, mongs and other window-licking spackers, I don't believe that they should be allowed on the London Underground during the rush hour. They don't always stand on the right-hand side of the escalator and thus cause undue delay for commuters who wish to walk up and, furthermore, they don't know how to use the barriers properly and so cause additional delays there as well. As I said, I've got nothing against spazzas as people (unlike...
Atheism is a belief
I read your debate on "whether or not atheism exists". I thought it was a horrible blow out, in your favor. :) That said, I disagree with your position of atheism as not a faith. Atheism may not be an organized religion, but it is definately a faith. Atheism is "1) the doctrine or belief that there is no God 2) a lack of belief in the existence of God or gods " note: **Belief** that there is no God. My sole contention rests on the fact that it is impossible to prove a ne...
Does Atheism really exist?
I don't believe in the belief of Atheism, I think if you think about it logically no such a belief can exist, but I am not willing to go in depth with why before I have somebody to debate with. So, who will have at it with me?...
The Theory of Evolution
Yes I know the good old fashion creation vs evolution debate. I believe Evolution is an abundantly flawed theory and I think that there is overwhelming evidence of an intelligent designer. I will await my opponent's opening statement before I make my case Thank you...
chicken c0mes first before egg
iN thE bibLe goD sAid "Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to its kind" it meAns hE maDe LiVing crETUrES (ANIMALS) not EGGS ......
Post-Modernism: A paper tiger
"[i]The new rebel is a skeptic, and will not entirely trust anything. He has no loyalty; therefore he can never be really a revolutionist. And the fact that he doubts everything really gets in his way when he wants to denounce anything. For all denunciation implies a moral doctrine of some kind; and the modern revolutionist doubts not only the institution he denounces, but the doctrine by which he denounces it. Thus he writes one book complaining that imperial oppression insults the purity of...
Socially conservative evangelicals are hypocritical
Greetings. Let me get right to the point, and I apologize in advance for sounding preachy. When are evangelicals going to stop being hypocrites by voting Republican? I believe in God......but I DON'T believe in the Christian church. Its turned religion into a bureaucracy. Throughout its history, it has used scare tactics like heaven and hell, violence (Crusades), and racism to build "faith". It has been filled with hate and bigotry for so long, and even today's evagelical version of it sti...
Pascal's Wager
Pascal's Wager ~That it is a better to believe that God exists than not to believe, because the expected value of believing is always greater than the expected value of not believing. In essence, atheists may as well believe in case they are wrong, and if they are right, no harm done. This is an argument still used by theists today, I'm hoping one will pick up this debate and run with it, unless someone wishes to play Devil's Advocate :)...
Logic proves that natural man is aware of a greater cause. Religion has distorted that awareness.
What I am about to purpose is entirely a product of my own mind, hence I expect loopholes and since I consider this an absolute fact, I believe I should be able to solve them accordingly. I will now begin.. Religion and Science are one. Relgion can be defined as the yearning of the subject to know its true nature. while science can be defined as the system in which the subject (through the object), exisits in. The subject (human mind), can only contemplate on what it gathers from the 5 se...
All drugs of all classifications should be legal.
Drugs should be legal, there is no moral or logical reason to make them illegal. 1.They can be taxed, more income that people would be happy to pay. 2.Many of them are harmless in the short term. 3.We've wasted more money on the war on drugs than we would have simply TREATING addicts and ignoring casual users. 4.Most of these drugs are only psychologically addictive (Weed, Shrooms, etc) and are no more dangerous than chocolate. 5.There is actually little conclusive evidence supporting ma...