 |
Yraelz's Debates
  |
Children exhibit moral behavior, but are not morally praisworthy for it.
The position on offer is that children, while they exhibit moral behavior, are not morally praisworthy (or blameworthy) for said behavior. I affirm. ********************* It is instrumental to first understand what children ARE doing as opposed to what one might SAY they are doing. In order to make a moral judgment about something from a first-person (or 3rd-person) perspective, one must recognize that society conforms to a certain set of rules. These rules are not subject to cross-cultura...
Truths exists irrespective of the observer..
Many people argue that the Truth is a relative concept. I understand that truth is always absolute but the perception of truth is relative and depends on the observer. The difference in perception do not alter the nature of truth but our understanding of it.....
Yraelz should delete his debate.com account.
And why not? This will of course be my 100th debate, and I will as far as my knowledge goes be the first debater to have ever achieved so many debates on this website. Followed by dairygirl4u2c, having 99 debates. Thus as it is my desire to delete my debate.com account, the best thing to do having debated 100 debates would be to celebrate by doing something I desire. Therefor I should delete my debate.com account. Who cares to stand in opposition?...
Infanticide should be encouraged up to the age of 3
On another debate, debate.com member Yraelz makes the pronouncement, "Infanticide should be encouraged in all situations. Infants should not have the rights until 3 years of age." Source: http://www.debate.com/debates/infants-born-alive-by-accident-during-partial-birth-should-be-killed/1/ Provided (s)he accepts the debate, I would like for Yraelz to present the reason why this should be lawfully and morally encouraged in all situations, and why infants should not have rights until the...
Paying to be a debate.com member is a fundamentally good idea.
No, it's not currency I speak of, nor is it anything tangible which you must give up. My proposal is simple, I am advocating a payment of 1 instigated debate per month. This means that to keep a membership on this website you must instigate at least one debate per month. I feel this would be overall advantageous....
DADT should be repealed in favor of allowing gay service members to serve openly.
A military debate that I haven't done for quite some time. DADT is a flawed policy, not only does it fail in practical use but it also fails the purpose that is was created for. Whats more, it hurts our country and our national security far more than it could ever help. Thus I stand in firm affirmation of the topic: DADT should be repealed in favor of allowing gay service members to serve openly....
Many religions detract from the beauty of our earth.
This one is coming from Nietzsche, it being one of his ideas that I enjoyed. My stance: Many religions detract from the beauty of our earth. Any religious folk out there care to defend?...
If a creator and an anti-creator do exist then we should not follow the teachings of the bible.
I am referring to your previous debate that ended in a forfeit. I will start with arguing the points you presented. "1. Everything outside of the kingdom of god is within the kingdom of darkness, commonly belonging to Satan. (This point might prove to be irrelevant but I like it anyways.)" Honestly, I do find this point to be irrelevant, but if you would like to show me its relevance, then I would be happy to argue it with you. I just don't see where it is leading at this current time. "2....
Multiple stab wounds may be harmful to monkeys.
I can only feel that there is a strong possibility that multiple stab wounds may be harmful to monkeys. I await for what rebuttal my opponent could possibly have....
From a debate judging standpoint Yraelz should win the "Jesus vs. Buuda..." debate with i-win-347.
Here is the debate: http://www.debate.com/debates/Jesus-vs.-Buuda-who-will-win-PRO-Jesus-Neg-Buuda/1/ I challenge someone here to show me why my opponent should win this debate. Offer me reasons and I will rebut them either by showing that i-win-347 didn't say the points you put forward or by showing why your analysis is contrary to ethical debate principles. (Or any other option I can think of.) I stand in firm affirmation that I should win that debate....