 |
burningpuppies101's Debates
  |
you are more evil than i am crazy Sudden Death
I have one and only one thing to say for this final debataextravaganza... You are so much more evil than i am crazy because of all of the brutal defeats that you have handed me and lack of remorse or gratitude. I will look forward to seeing you refute this ace of an argument but good luck, see you soon, happy new year, thank you,...
Assited Suicide
Thanks to my opponent for the debate, and thanks to my voters for voting for the arguments, not the person. This first round will be used to set the stage on which this debate will be held. It will have some ground rules, which I believe will help keep this debate fair and fun for all involved. 1. No arguments this round, just rules. 2. My opponent is welcome to suggest new rules for this debate, and if I like them, I'll add them. 3. No semantics in this debate. We all know what we a...
Euthanasia in a medical setting is moral
I think that euthanasia in a medical setting can be morally justified. I'll let you start the debate....
the game!!! serious debate
ok very surprised that I did not see this anywhere in the archive of debates... many people know about the game and with knowing about the game, everyone who read this just lost it. My question is"Can you win at the game?" or rewording,"How do you not loose the game?" ok so what is the game you ask? There are five rules to the game, they are as follows: * Rule number 1: You are playing The Game. * Rule number 2: Whenever you think about The Game, you lose. * Rule number 3: Loss must...
Chopsticks vs Forks
i would like to start by saying i have not read the other chopstick debate because i do not yet want it to influence my ideals this debate i am starting because i like the topic and i am writing a real life dialog essay for a class i have choosen the side of chopsticks i would like an opponent who is on the side of forks please first the health benefit of chopsticks if far greater then that of the fork with a fork u can get the food now eat fast even though it takes ur body 15 minutes to...
Term Limits
Thanks to my opponent for the debate. This debate shall be about Term Limits in the United States. More specifically, Presidential Term Limits in the United States. I am against them, and my opponent is in favor of them. Restated the topic is this: Presidential Term Limits in the United States should not be used. We all know who the President is. We all know what term limits are. They are: 2 terms of 4 years. We all know what the US is. Some rules: These rules cannot be broken, or else m...
The Validity of Philosophical Skepticism
The debate is not about whether or not we should actually be skeptics, but rather whether or not skepticism has any valid points....
There Is Nothing Morally Wrong With Slaughter. (it's true!)
I hope you had a good retreat jh. I know I did (except when I spent twenty mins looking 4 my bag) The above statement is absolutely true and I know you know it. But, please, argue with me. I find such things entertaining....
It is morally permissible to kill one innocent person to save the lives of many innocent people.
I affirm the resolution: It is morally permissible to kill one in order to save others To clarify this case I will use the following definition: Morally permissible: that act of judging in a circumstance to conform the right behavior Kill: To take way one's life; cause death Innocent: free from evil motives or moral wrongs Happiness: absence of pain and up bearings Save: to rescue or prevent harm or injury Society: a highly structured human organization upheld by hierarchy which furb...
Resolved: It is morally permissible to kill one innocent person to save the lives of many innocent
First off I am a novice ld debater and i need practice so another ld debater would be great. So lets get started. It is morally permissible to kill one innocent person to save the lives of many innocent. First i will start with some definitions. All definitions are from www.thefreedictionary.com. mor·al (môrl, mr-) adj. 1. Of or concerned with the judgment of the goodness or badness of human action and character: moral scrutiny; a moral quandary. 2. Teaching or exhibiting goodness or corr...