God loves draxxt

yes, god loves you!
in every way.
for everything you do.
yes.
everything.
by him loving you,
he exists.
and loves you.
:)

Hello. I would like to begin by thanking my opponent for challenging me to this debate. Though, perhaps I should begin by asking my judges not to vote on their own personal bias but rather, on the logic that will exceed my opponent's debate.
My opponent's entire first argument consisting of one contention and no further explanation as to why God loves me.

"yes, god loves you!
in every way.
for everything you do.
yes.
everything.
by him loving you,
he exists.
and loves you.
:)"
I would like to add that the smiley face is a nice touch. My opponent's first and only contention deals with a circular argument. In order for God to love me, He must exist. And for Him to exist, he must love me. God cannot exist unless he loves me and he cannot love me unless he exists.
My opponent's logic is flawed for the following contentions.:

1) My opponent has not explained to me how God exists except through circular logic.

A) We must first define love
Merriam webster defines
love as "strong affection for another arising out of kinship or personal ties <maternal love for a child>"

B) We must define exist.
exists as "to have real being whether material or spiritual <did unicorns exist>"
Merriam-Webster defines the spiritual side of existance as a question or an assumption. We cannot assume God exists without proof.

2) My opponent's case sounds like a thread that you send to umpteen people and your wildest dreams will come true.

I believe I have said all that is necessary. Please, if you can answer any of my questions with logic, all circular logic aside, I would greatly appreciate it.
For the above reasons, that is why I urge you to vote in Negation of this resolution.

I would like to offer flor my deepest of thanks. This truly will be an easy win. You see, my problem isn't the topic or its message, for I myself am a Christian, but the fact that this user most likely singles out Christian members in the hope that said members will forfeit or refuse to argue in the first place. Either way, she's getting God's message out but in a very annoying and detestable way.
Thank you for the challenge and again, no bias, please.