Help to prevent the extinction of species
Winning
24 Points
Losing
15 Points
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
| Started: | 5/5/2008 | Category: | Science |
| Updated: | 3 months ago | Status: | Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 170 times | Debate No: | 3905 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (13)
|
Why shouldn't we help prevent it? Humans are the ones causeing all the pollutiona and habitat destruction that is making it difficult for species to adapt and reproduce.
Life is very versatile. While it is true that human domination of the planet kills many, many species a day, the pollution and waste is going to be a self limiting factor. Man cannot beat nature, it is simply unbeatable. Even if we make the planet so inhospitable that human race itself will be near wiped out, other life forms will still thrive, and after humans are extinct, the world will reform itself. Given that, the only reason why we should bother to preserve species, is if it directly affects us. This can reduce even more down to "We should only preserve our own species". Why help prevent the extinction of other species? my opponent uses evolutionary adaptation in his argument. However, he assumes that evolution is not just a teleological process, but a fair process in which all living species have a right to evolve. This is severely flawed. If humans are superior species, why should we go out of our way to prevent the extinction of other species other than for our own personal gain? |
![]() |
|
Green_bean09 forfeited this round.
Obviously my opponent has not responded, so my arguments stand. I really hope he decides to return because I don't really like winning by default. |
![]() |
|
Green_bean09 forfeited this round.
It's a beautiful day in this neighborhood, a beautiful day for a neighbor. Would you be mine? could you be mine? won't you be my neighbor? Thank you for attending this debate. See you tomorrow neighbor. |
![]() |
13 votes have been cast for this debate.
Coming in September, 2008
A complete graphical breakdown of the votes by:
- Age Group
- Country
- Education
- Ethnicity
- Gender
- Ideology
- Income
- Political Party
- Religion
Show people this debate by sending them this public link:






P.S. I like the throwback to Mister Roger's Neighborhood.
how pro got 4 votes is a mystery to me. probably they just read the topic and voted for the side they agreed with. such a horrible thing that is, if only rfd's were required. *sigh*
Fact is, as the populace grows, so does the need for space to house us all. So does the need for more land to grow crops. And drill for oil.
Methinks your concern for extinction of certain animals stops at your own doorstep. Sounds like a great idea, as long as it doesn't affect YOUR way of life.
We should go out of are way because we are already the superior species and we should give the animals a chance to evolve and because these species make this world exciting and fasinating,they make people think about there is more in the world than humans,so killing them for your own personal gain is just a stupid excuse to become a killer just a bloodthirsty killer and you need animals in your life with out them the world is incomplete and KNOWN but if animal were not to become extinct the world would become more UNKNOWN as people would find more and learn more about these great creatures.