In this debate, I will lose.

Dear opponent, and all the people watching this debate.As you could tell, my opponent is an amazing debator. He's got an average of 81.25% in winning, while i have none.Repete will continue and become the best while i rot in a trashcan.
opponent has different positions in the government and the society compared to me, which is because his mind is much more superior that an 11- year old's brain like me.

I negate the debate topic on the grounds that no one can know or prove for certain who will win or lose this debate. I will begin by responding to my opponents claims as to why she thinks it is certain or even provable who will be victorious in this debate.

"As you could tell, my opponent is an amazing debator. He's got an average of 81.25% in winning, while i have none."

This is presumptuous and incorrect. I am not an amazing debater, or even a good one for that matter. While my win ratio is of the order of 80%, I tend to take on debates posed by others, rather than start my own. This gives me an advantage over a lot of other debaters who start a majority of their debates. And it's true that my opponent currently has a 0% win ratio, but that is 1 loss from 1 debate, which is not representative of either a good or a bad debater. My opponent and I have both lost 1 debate, and in fact the debate I lost was similar to this one in context.

"opponent has different positions in the government and the society compared to me, which is because his mind is much more superior that an 11- year old's brain like me."

My opponent and myself may or may not have varying positions in society, but this has absolutely nothing to do with this debate.

Now that I have responded to my opponent's arguments, I will pose my own - It is up to my opponent to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that she will lose this debate. I propose that this is impossible to prove. I will provide a few possibilities for how I could lose this debate. If even one of these proposals is possible, my opponent should lose the debate.

1. My opponent could start numerous accounts for debate.com, and vote against me with each one. This would more likely than not result in my losing the debate.

2. My opponent may have many friends on this site who will vote for her without so much as reading the debate.

3. The voters of this site may find my opponent's arguments to be more well-rounded and to provide more evidence than my own. This would surely result in my defeat.

I will leave it here for now, but my point is clear. It is impossible to prove this resolution, and at best my opponent has made a guess. I have shown a number of ways I could lose this debate, all of which are possible if not probable.

Although my opponent's 2nd round was further evidence to support her hypothesis that she would lose this debate, my point still stands. My opponent must prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that she will lose this debate. She has so far failed to do so. Vote CON.

Although my opponent's 2nd and 3rd rounds were further evidence to support her hypothesis that she would lose this debate, my point still stands. My opponent must prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that she will lose this debate. She has so far failed to do so. Vote CON.