Sedo - Buy and Sell Domain Names and Websites project info: debate.com Statistics for project debate.com etracker® web controlling instead of log file analysis
The Instigator
alfie_alfred2000
Pro (for)
Losing
33 Points
The Contender
CiRrO
Con (against)
Winning
47 Points

Knowledge about the past is usefull to complete our knowledge of the world we live in

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Started: 7/27/2008 Category: Education
Updated: 3 months ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 220 times Debate No: 4805
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (15)
Votes (24)

 

alfie_alfred2000

Pro

Knowledge of the past is as important as all the knowledge we are getting in our daily life.it is cause of this knowledge that we are able to develop our current knowledge to the next level.
CiRrO

Con

I negate: knowledge about the past is usefull to complete our knowledge of the world we live in

My Reason for negation: Knowledge about the past is not just useful it is necessary. Thus I negate.

Contention I: Past knowledge is necessary.

To get to the point of knowledge now, we need past knowledge. If we did not, then all knowledge now would go backwards, and there would be no advancement. If we didn't learn about the wheel, then we would have no cars. If we didn't learn basic farming techniques, there would be no farming industry. The list goes on and on. To get to where we are now, then the past is necessary not just useful.

Thank you ladies and gentlemen.
Debate Round No. 1
alfie_alfred2000

Pro

alfie_alfred2000 forfeited this round.
CiRrO

Con

Extend my arguments. ^^

Character length.....length, length, length, length, length, length, length, length, length, length, length, length
Debate Round No. 2
alfie_alfred2000

Pro

alfie_alfred2000 forfeited this round.
CiRrO

Con

Extend my arguments.

[Voting Issues]

1) Contention I
2) Resolution is negated off of the premise that knowledge about the past is a necessity rather then just a utility.

Thank you ladies and gentlemen.
Debate Round No. 3
15 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 11 through 15 records.
Posted by Dali 3 months ago
Dali
Too bad that it looks as though this debate will simply forfeit out. I would like to see this topic in full force.
Posted by CiRrO 3 months ago
CiRrO
Ugh, are u her eon all my debates, u just pop out of nowhere. IO apologize for my grammatical error. I was going for the effect that usefulness is different then necessity. It should say: Knowledge about the past is not just useful, it is necessary. I forgot the comma. I did not want to make it your way by showing usefulness and necessity. I was negating on the fact that past knowledge is a necessity rather then just a utility. Hope I cleared that up. ^^
Posted by theLwerd 3 months ago
theLwerd
"Knowledge about the past is not just useful it is necessary."

This sentence is not gramatically correct. If it were, it would read, 'Knowledge about the past is not just useful, it is ALSO necessary.'" A conjunction of some kind is necessary to make that sentence acceptable. Now if the sentence were properly written, the conjunction 'also' would indicate that in *addition* to knowledge of the past being necessary, it is ALSO useful... meaning that the resolution is absolutely correct, and you should vote Pro. You can agree with Con's contention, and still Pro's affirmation of the resolution would be supported and true. Why? The resolution does not indicate that knowledge of the past is only/specifically useful and nothing else; however, it's open-ended enough to the point where it doesn't exclude things like necessity.

A clear vote for Pro.

(Assuming he doesn't mess it up...)
Posted by Puck 3 months ago
Puck
Tempting for the challenge, but I suspect it will be forfeit rounds. If it's here a bit later I'll take it.
Posted by Rezzealaux 3 months ago
Rezzealaux
shoulders of giants for the win.
Loading voting charts...

Show people this debate by sending them this public link: