Watch This Debate
Report This Debate
Forward This Debate
Debate Comments
Bookmark This Page
Category: Politics

National Sovereignty

This debate began on Thursday, April 24, 2008, 4:46:10 PM Pacific Time.
Who Won This Debate?
 
Vote For nater
2 Votes
 
Vote For MDHarris08
0 Votes
 
 
Pro"In Favor"
The Instigator: nater
nater
Versus
Con"Against"
The Contender: MDHarris08
MDHarris08
 
 
Pro ~ Round 1

Political analyst Richard Perle said: "National sovereignty is an obligation as well as entitlement fo all governments." When isolationism is not valued higly enough, this goal of government will not be achieved. Ntaional sovereignty violation can lead to the infringement of human rights, violation of justice, and direct infringement upon what political analysts claim to be a right of the government. Becuase I believe National Sovereignty will be better upheld if the United States chooses to balue isolaionism as a greater good, I stand resolved: That the U.S.A ought to more highly value isolationism.
 
Con ~ Round 1

This round was forfeited because the debater did not post their argument within the allotted time.
 
Pro ~ Round 2

This round was forfeited because the debater did not post their argument within the allotted time.
 
Con ~ Round 2

This round was forfeited because the debater did not post their argument within the allotted time.
 
Pro ~ Round 3

This round was forfeited because the debater did not post their argument within the allotted time.
 
Con ~ Round 3

This round was forfeited because the debater did not post their argument within the allotted time.
 
 

Member Comments (1)

Only members can post comments.

 
I'll take this debate, Nater...
6 Days Ago
Report It