"The Game" Causes an equal loss in both the "Loser(s)" and the "Instigator(s)"
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
| Started: | 7/8/2008 | Category: | Society |
| Updated: | 4 months ago | Status: | Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 249 times | Debate No: | 4634 |
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (18)
Votes (21)
|
WHEN the following conditions are met
"The Game" follows these three rules. 1. Everybody in the world who knows about the Game, is playing the Game. 2. Whenever you think about The Game, you lose. 3. Loss must be announced. WHEN ALSO The "Instigator" is defined as "The person who causes any other person to lose the game, intentionally or unintentionally" AND WHEN the "Loser" is defined as somebody who has met the first condition of rule 1 (that they know that they are playing the game), and also the condition in rule 2 (That they are thinking of the game) GIVEN THAT It is possible to be both the Instigator and a Loser at the same time, in some circumstances FOR CLARITY- ALSO ASSUME THAT One loss of game is equal to minus one "Game Points", So that losing the game one time would net -1 "Game Points". END OF RULES, NO MORE RULES MAY BE SET I let my opponent begin.
Hello, I am Logical-Master's older brother, Mark, and I have been instructed to read no more than what I am typing on this page, until instructed otherwise. I've also been instructed to inform you that the only words I've seen is "your, argument, new, debating tips, and help." I hope we can have a fun debate. Good luck, Duco. |
![]() |
|
DucoNihilum forfeited this round.
I'm sorry to hear that my opponent has forfeited his last round. I really hope it isn't because I didn't look at anything he typed in his first round. I'm not trying to be rude, but my brother has told me that it would not be wise to read anything yet. I am dying in anticipation. and that's all I got to say right now. |
![]() |
|
DucoNihilum forfeited this round.
I accept my opponent's apology and wish him quick recovery in his pursuits. Hopefully, I can learn about this debate in the next round. |
![]() |
|
DucoNihilum forfeited this round.
Once more, Duco has forfeited his round. My source (my brother) has indicated that it would not be wise to look at the first round until this debate has ended. I guess that because I have not once acknowledged whatever there is in the first round, I win this debate (I think). So yeah, vote for me. |
![]() |
Loading voting charts...
Show people this debate by sending them this public link:













I guess that if I were to have read the round before posting in my last round, it would have been an equal loss since Duco forfeited twice. Very interesting and creative.
Was the forfeit a strategical move?