The user known as "brittwaller" should not have lost the following debates

I don't really have the time for a full-on debate right now, but I wanted to check out the newer features on the site, as well as clean up my record a little.

Now, I have been vexed for some time by the fact that my Total War community website has better-behaved members, and can settle on a standard of civility so much easier than this site, which is, ostensibly, devoted to debate and is so full of "intellectuals." That's only a side point (not an analogy), but is relevant because I believe that I was either voted against out of pure personal bias, or that multiple accounts were used against me, or that people simply voted based on opinion, or that some of the people that voted are simply ignorant, or whatever combination of the above factors you want to use. Any of those scenarios are possible, as anyone that has been here for a minute knows that these things are more or less "inherent" in the system (this is what vexes me...)

It should be noted that I haven't put every loss I've had up here for re-examination. I have some well-deserved losses, indeed, and do not have a problem with losing in and of itself. I do, however, have a problem with losing when I should have clearly won, or in one case, tied.

Here they are.

http://www.debate.com...
http://www.debate.com...

I should have won in those instances, hands-down. At this point, I will say it is self-evident. If it is not so evident to my opponent, I will explain and clarify as needed.

http://www.debate.com...

This debate should be a tie, as my opponent and friend sweatingjojo and I specifically asked no one to vote on the discussion - not a debate. The content of the debate makes clear that only small-minded, self-serving tricksters would have sabotaged our pure discussion. Hilarious!

I look forward to a good debate here.

Britt

Your examples are faulty.

For one of the first two links, some extremely good-looking and intelligent person has already voted you into winning.

For the third one, the same extremely good-looking and intelligent person has voted it into a tie :P

The return of Kleptin is a great thing.

Unfortunately, and wisely, in this instance, my opponent obviously agrees with me due to his actions to correct the said problems. This kind of makes the position of CON null and void. As of the writing of this post, about 9 pm CST, the score on the debate that should have been tied is actually tied, so as long as no one touches that one it should be golden. it is tied right down the middle, 30 to 30. Very nice. I say that as it would be a disservice to both sweatingjojo and I if it falters again. The other two are closer, but not reversed.

I did not make this debate for vanity, but for rational justice 8)

This is ridiculous. Someone actually voted for the other guy after I turned the tables on one. Both of those debates were clear wins, I suspect foul play >.>

Once more objective voters are there to examine the debates, it'll be better.

Yours hasn't even started and you are doing better. I believe it may not be foul play but perhaps a form of mild retardation... We will see I suppose.

That's because mine started showing results when it ENDED.

With this response, I believe we will see some attention to your misvoted debates :P