You cannot disprove the existence of God.

Please, somebody completely convince me that there is absolutely no way there is a Creator of the world. You cannot disprove the existence of God, it's not possible.

Certainly there is no way to disprove the existence of a god or other such entities. However there is also no way to disprove the existence of leprechauns, unicorns, Santa Claus, or the Easter Bunny. Yet most people would agree that none of those things exist since the evidence shows that they are more likely than not, nonexistent. The same applies to gods there is no evidence to show that said entity exists therefore it makes more scientific sense to assume there is no god.

To show that there is no god is impossible and to show that there is a god is also impossible. Likewise to show that leprechauns aren't real is impossible and to show that they are real is also impossible.

It's essentially a paradox; If something isn't real you can't prove it's real and you can't prove that it's not real. What you can do is search for evidence of existence and where there is none one must conclude that what is being sought after is not real. However since the absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence one should remain open to possible existence upon the provision of sufficient evidence, which is unlikely to happen.

The best way to disprove the existence of a god would be to understand when and how the notion of the existence of god came to be. For example Santa Clause isn't real and we all know that because we know how the myth came to be and practical knowledge shows that it is unlikely that such a person can exist.

Well, the only thing I am confused about is why are you siding with my side of the argument, that you cannot disprove God, when you chose to be on the side that disagreed with my statement?

Do you know in debate it does not always matter whether you're right or wrong and factual logic is not always necessarily key, but may you rather (and what I was more so looking for in this debate, I don't think I quite elaborated on it enough though, so defiantly pardon me for that) but you chose to pick the side to prove to me that the existence of God is not real, whether you believe it or not, I suppose I was looking for a battle of the wits using self produced logic just to back up the actual statement that you chose to side with. But, I realize I wasn't very clear on that, so pardon me. =]

I'm not taking your side of the argument. What I was doing is stating that there is no way for anyone to disprove the existence of something that doesn't exist. In order to prove something exist one requires evidence and when something doesn't exist there will be no evidence and hence one must conclude that it does not exist, but cannot prove that it doesn't exist since there will be a complete lack of evidence to substantiate either claim.
Do unicorns exist? No they do not. Can you prove they don't exist? No. How do you tell they're not real…well you look for them and when you've exhausted all means of locating them you must conclude that the don not exist. The same applies to the gods. They do not exist on Earth, they have no influence on the Earth or its inhabitants (something some may doubt), and there is no proof to show existence.

Since there is no way to disprove the existence of something that doesn't exist one must use conjecture. There simply is no evidence to show that there is a god and the complete lack of evidence is proof that there is no supreme creator. And although the lack of evidence doesn't necessarily mean that there is no god it does prove that there is no god in the popular sense of a deity which is an active part of the world.

You are, once again, missing what I am trying to say.

I'm not looking for an arguement where there is an absolute true answer, but rather two people regardless of belief, taking a side and using simple logic and twist to not necessarily prove a point in the end, but for the simple reason of the debate.

and technically yeah you are siding with me.
I'm pro that you cannot disprove, don't argue with me about whether or not you ACTUALLY can disprove (people try and disprove things on this site all the time and in the end it's still a matter of one's own thought) but take up your side of the arguement, and flow with it.
just. forfet. you're not getting me. sorry if I wasn't clear.
XD

I understand what you're trying to say and I'm not siding with you I'm just stating that to definitively prove something doesn't exist is impossible and therefore not worth debating. However to using logic to prove that something doesn't exist is possible and is what I was trying to do...though I guess what I was saying wasn't very clear.
I was essentially showing that you can prove there is no god but at the same time stating that if you're looking for an absolute answer there is none to be had.

I see my opponent has neglected to post another arguement, and as such I haven't any cause to post anything...

Seeing thatmy opponent hasn't posted any arguement I wouldn't either, though I did intend to...irreguardless it's over...