Sedo - Buy and Sell Domain Names and Websites project info: debate.com Statistics for project debate.com etracker® web controlling instead of log file analysis
The Instigator
ally93
Con (against)
Losing
12 Points
The Contender
Maya9
Pro (for)
Winning
49 Points

do u think abortions should be legal?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Started: 6/27/2008 Category: Health
Updated: 5 months ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 182 times Debate No: 4524
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (1)
Votes (15)

 

ally93

Con

i think that it should be a law because u are taking away an unborns life thats not fair. if u get pregnant then have it and give it up instead of throwing away a life. to me thats not right for an unborn baby to not be born (con)
Maya9

Pro

Your opening argument isn't really an argument at all, is it?

You seem to be saying that it is not "fair" or "right" to abort a fetus. These are subjective terms. You can't simply assume that others will judge by YOUR moral standards, or even that your moral standards are correct. You have to back up your morals, provide us with some reason to judge them to be of value. What is "fair" and "right"? More importantly, why?

The simple fact is that life simply isn't fair. According to an article in the New England Journal of Medicine (http://content.nejm.org...), 25% of pregnancies result in miscarriage within the first six weeks. According to another study in Denmark (http://www.bmj.com...), 75% of pregnancies of women over the age of 45 result in miscarriages. Apparently, nature (or God, if you wish) doesn't care much about what you think is fair.

You seem to be working under additional unproven premises: that life (or at least human life) holds some sort of sanctity, and that the life of the fetus is somehow more important than the liberties of the mother. So prove why this should be considered true.
Debate Round No. 1
ally93

Con

yes that is true. i think what your trying to tell me is that a mother has the right to get an abortion. but what i'm saying is that it should not be premitted in the US. why because the baby has the right to live a life instead of the mother just throwing that life away. so i think that a mother should have the child but if she doesn't want it then she could give it up for adoption. (con)
Maya9

Pro

You don't seem to get it. You don't get to say or assume what is right or wrong. You have to back up your opinions. Your morals don't constitute a logical argument.
Debate Round No. 2
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by austinrsell 5 months ago
austinrsell
Morally, I agree with the ally93, but as an actual debater i have to say the Maya9 has a point. Ally93 simply has too many unwarranted claims.
Loading voting charts...

Show people this debate by sending them this public link: