God loves draxxt

flor
draxxt

yes, god loves you! in every way. for everything you do. yes. everything. by him loving you, he exists. and loves you. :)...

Voting Period
21 Comments
Updated 4 Months Ago

An omnipresent God is an atheist.

draxxt
Kleptin

My opponent may provide anything he wishes, I allow him first and last argument out of respect. The only thing I must do is clarify a few terms for this debate. Omnipresent- everywhere all the time the resolution implies the existence of a God with this characteristic, so don't tell me to "prove it", I'll make my case after my opponents opening argument, however I would like one question to be answered: What is the smallest block of life, the minutest stone which lays the first foundat...

Voting Period
20 Comments
Updated 4 Months Ago

Education is stealing constitutional rights

draxxt
Harboggles

I propose to you, ladies and gentlemen, that no matter how hard you fight it, high schools and below are trying to allieviate from us the basic human rights in which our founding fathers worked so hard to uphold. Now I, as a freshman in my class, have already come to realise that my freedom of speech, press, and religion. I am not granted the right to worship freely in school but, by God himself, I will. I am not allowed to write a scandal of a teacher and yet I shall if one might occur. And by...

Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 4 Months Ago

It is impossible to fully win this debate

draxxt
crazypenguin

I attest to whom it might concern, that no matter what I say, I cannot fully win. A) To fully win I must win both the round and I must make my opponent concede to my opinionso if my opponent concedesand I win the debate then I lose the debate and if he argues and I lose, Then I win. But I haven't fully won....

Voting Period
17 Comments
Updated 4 Months Ago

It is morally acceptable to test products designed for human benefit or use on non-human animals.

draxxt
HadenQuinlan

I would first like to thank my opponent for accepting this debate. I must also say that when I refer to "Animals" it is a reference to non-human animals. First I must define a few terms: Merriam-Webster defines: Immoral as "not moral; broadly : conflicting with generally or traditionally held moral principles" Moral as "of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior : ethical" right as "righteous, upright" behaviour as " the manner of conducting oneself " I will attempt to ar...

Voting Period
3 Comments
Updated 4 Months Ago

It is impossible to fully win this debate.

draxxt
Korezaan

I attest to whom it might concern, that no matter what I say, I cannot fully win. A) To win I must win both the round and I must make my opponent concede to my opinion so B) if my opponent concedes and I win the debate then I lose the debate and if he argues and I lose, Then I win. But I haven't fully won....

Voting Period
9 Comments
Updated 4 Months Ago

10% (Kemonomimi/Nekomimi) is not furry.

s0m31john
draxxt

I will first define some keywords. Kemonomimi - an anime and manga terminology describing humanoid characters that possess animal-like features. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kemonomimi) Nekomimi - a female with cat ears, a cat tail, or other feline accoutrements on an otherwise human-shaped body. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nekomimi) Examples of the above two can be found at http://img.7chan.org/n/ NSFW Furry - the term used to define pornographic content (generally drawings, more...

Voting Period
9 Comments
Updated 4 Months Ago

HoosierPapi, a member of debate.com, is close-minded and obnoxious

littlelacroix
draxxt

I and, from what I can tell, many others have been harassed by one of the members on debate.com. His name is HoosierPapi (the link to his page is as follows... http://www.debate.com/HoosierPapi). I would like to start this debate by asking my opponent to find even a single instance where this man offered decent criticism without being close-mind and obnoxious... I rest my case. But for the sake of this debate, I offer two instances of him attacking me. 1) "Idiotically, typically homophobic...

Voting Period
12 Comments
Updated 4 Months Ago

The United States Of America Was Not Founded On Christian Principles.

draxxt
HadenQuinlan

The Constitution is, in no way, Specifically based upon Christian values. Christian is reffered to as anything within the Catholic/Protestant churches and therefore, are limited to the teaches hence. In the following two contentions I will attempt to Prove that The USA was not founded on Christian Principles. 1> There is a difference between basic human morals and Christian Principles. A)Anyone can have the basic influence of fear when it comes to something immoral or indecent and is given thr...

Voting Period
10 Comments
Updated 4 Months Ago