New News Debates http://www.debate.com/rss/debates/News.xml This RSS feed lists the newest debates in the News category on Debate.com. en-us 2008-07-20T11:58:55-08:00 2008-07-20T11:58:55-08:00 should the jail guards suffer the same penalty as the prisoners escape during their watch? http://www.debate.com/debates/should-the-jail-guards-suffer-the-same-penalty-as-the-prisoners-escape-during-their-watch/1/ This House Believes that the jail guards should not suffer the same penalty as the prisoners escape during their watch. http://www.debate.com/debates/should-the-jail-guards-suffer-the-same-penalty-as-the-prisoners-escape-during-their-watch/1/comments/ 2008-07-20T01:07:28-08:00 The Internet: The Last True Example of Free Speech (Net Neutrality) http://www.debate.com/debates/The-Internet-The-Last-True-Example-of-Free-Speech-Net-Neutrality/1/ NOTE: DO NOT TAKE THIS DEBATE IF YOU ARE GOING TO DEBATE THAT THE INTERNET IS OUR LAST VESTAGE OF FREE SPEECH. THAT IS NOT THE TOPIC OF THIS DEBATE. NET NEUTRALITY IS. I believe that Net Neutrality should be spared, and should be kept away from Virgin Media's grubby, greedy hands. For those who don't know, I'll summarize net neutrality in a simple way. Net neutrality is what lets you sit at your computer, hop on the internet, and visit every site on the internet at the same speed. Now, granted it will not always be the same each visit. There is sure to be differing ammounts of content on each site your computer has to process. What Virgin Media plans to do, is 'throttle' your internet. Which means, they can tell your computer to fo fast to one site, but slow to another. And they do this because, most people would pay to be in the fast lane. They can also block access entirely to sites you normally go to, and redirect you to sites their sponsors create. Which means, if Google does http://www.debate.com/debates/The-Internet-The-Last-True-Example-of-Free-Speech-Net-Neutrality/1/comments/ 2008-07-12T09:47:20-08:00 The revenge of hoopla http://www.debate.com/debates/The-revenge-of-hoopla/1/ Why were there no debates in the challenge period before I posted this one? I demand to know! If i don't find out within an hour I shall convert to Pacific/Islander religous beliefs. Yeah. Youkilis. He's on da wed sokks. Not the red sox. Da wed sokks. German folklore spelling. Also i believe that my argument is grammatically correct. So stop it debate.com. Someone needs to answer my question please. Weenis. I already expanded my opening argument. Fine, then I shall babble. My pancakes are spuds. My pancakes are spuds. Hidy-ho my pancakes are spuds. Anyway I think that my rightious beliefs are only valid in Spanglish. http://www.debate.com/debates/The-revenge-of-hoopla/1/comments/ 2008-06-27T19:10:06-08:00 The media isn't liberal http://www.debate.com/debates/The-media-isn-t-liberal/1/ Media will be all forms of print (newspapers, magazines, etc), TV news, radio, and the internet. You all should know the definitions of liberal and conservative. Anyway along with the opening: I would argue that the media isn't liberal. In this I contend that their is a wide range of philosophies of reporters and news stations but the media IS NOT overhelmingly liberal. Conservatives have just said "the liberal media" so many times without any evidence that it has become a fact. A great quote that I have come to love from the 1962 movie "The man who shot liberty valance." A man was credited for shooting this notorious outlaw, Liberty Valance, but he never really shot him. This brought the man fame and many years later (in the movie) he was telling his biographer the true story, and admits he didn't shoot the outlaw, the biographer rips up his notes and walks out saying, "When the legend becomes fact, print the legend" We are printing the legend. As i said bef http://www.debate.com/debates/The-media-isn-t-liberal/1/comments/ 2008-06-20T14:43:41-08:00 The late-night metro rail does more harm than good. http://www.debate.com/debates/The-late-night-metro-rail-does-more-harm-than-good./1/ The late-night metro rail does more harm than good and here is why: 1)It leads to more kidnaps. For example what if you is on the metro rail by yourself, maybe at, 1:00 in the morning and nobody is around but one stranger. THat will give that person to rape, kidnap, or do anything that they want to do. 2)More fights.Late night metro rail can lead to fights because most likely there will be more drunks on the metro rail, and this could lead into a big fight because the person that is drunk might act stupid or do dumb things towards another person. Meaning that the person that is not drunk to get very irritated. http://www.debate.com/debates/The-late-night-metro-rail-does-more-harm-than-good./1/comments/ 2008-06-03T20:13:42-08:00 If the Burmese Government wants no aid then other countries around the world should stop trying http://www.debate.com/debates/If-the-Burmese-Government-wants-no-aid-then-other-countries-around-the-world-should-stop-trying/1/ If the Burmese government does not want aid from other countries then those countries should stop trying. If the government wants there people to starve to death and die from diseases because they are afraid of people overthrowing their government then see if the people won't overthrow them. I am interested in hearing a response because in school my social studies class just did a debate on this! http://www.debate.com/debates/If-the-Burmese-Government-wants-no-aid-then-other-countries-around-the-world-should-stop-trying/1/comments/ 2008-06-02T10:41:50-08:00 war in Iraq http://www.debate.com/debates/war-in-Iraq/8/ here is my thing First. i think the whole reason why we went to war was because of 9/11 which is totally wrong. #1 steel which was in the towers can not be melted by fire. #2 there is no proof that it is exactly terrorists that did it Second. we attacked them Third. a republican is in the white house. Fourth. it is none of our business just because A as in 1 guy was not being so nice in Iraq does not mean that we should go to war against people who #1 did not say, "come and kill us" and we are dying for something that we started so it is all our(as in Bush)'s fault we are at war Fifth. Beat this http://www.debate.com/debates/war-in-Iraq/8/comments/ 2008-05-23T05:52:25-08:00 the topic of this debate is abortion and i believe that this is wrong because ur killing humans okay http://www.debate.com/debates/the-topic-of-this-debate-is-abortion-and-i-believe-that-this-is-wrong-because-ur-killing-humans-okay/1/ my opening argument is that abortion should be illegal b/c that is basically kilng a human being okay son so see me http://www.debate.com/debates/the-topic-of-this-debate-is-abortion-and-i-believe-that-this-is-wrong-because-ur-killing-humans-okay/1/comments/ 2008-05-22T16:00:39-08:00 the topic of this debate is abortion http://www.debate.com/debates/the-topic-of-this-debate-is-abortion/1/ my opening argument is that abortion should be illegal because your killing an innocent person. So when u think about it your committing murder. abortion sould not be a choice b/c it was there fault for having unprotected sex http://www.debate.com/debates/the-topic-of-this-debate-is-abortion/1/comments/ 2008-05-21T12:57:32-08:00 china's government http://www.debate.com/debates/china-s-government/1/ i don't think china is a communist state because. Communism does not have a centralized government. They are closer to socialism than communism. I would say a mixture of totalitarian and socialism, because totalitarian is of or pertaining to a centralized government that does not tolerate parties. Socialism means; a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole. http://www.debate.com/debates/china-s-government/1/comments/ 2008-05-26T19:03:57-08:00 about Chinese government http://www.debate.com/debates/about-Chinese-government/1/ some people say china is a communist state but some people say its not i dont think it is because China is not communist nor is it socialistic. It is also often referred to as totalitarian and a dictatorship. Both are equally as wrong too. Communism: is a the opposite of capitalism so therefore it is impossible they are communistic. The first people who were allowed to use limited capitalism were the farmers back in the 50's because of the failure of collective farming. The whole country is one huge capitalistic machine now. Socialistic: means the state controls all production, manufacturing and business. That is impossible as well since individuals own businesses and those state run businesses are a mixture of state and private working side by side. Currently today, less then 20% is state owned. 30 years ago it was 100%. Example, their oil industry is a mix of private and state working together and their cost per gallon of gas is $2.25. There are no taxes added, all the reven http://www.debate.com/debates/about-Chinese-government/1/comments/ 2008-05-26T11:21:30-08:00 A debater's sense of humor can ultimately affect the number of votes that debater receives. http://www.debate.com/debates/A-debater-s-sense-of-humor-can-ultimately-affect-the-number-of-votes-that-debater-receives./1/ Definitions from dictionary.com: "sense of humor noun the trait of appreciating (and being able to express) the humorous; "she didn't appreciate my humor"; "you can't survive in the army without a sense of humor" [syn: humor] " "ul·ti·mate·ly Audio Help (ŭl'tə-mĭt-lē) Pronunciation Key adv. At last; in the end; eventually." I don't think anyone will actually accept this debate, but oh well. I am going to prove that using a sense of humor can affect the number of debates a debater receives. 1) http://www.debate.com/debates/MANBEARPIG-is-a-greater-threat-than-Hillary-Clinton-just-barely/1/ As you can see, in the comments section, two people sated that CON had no sense of humor. If you'll notice that PRO is winning only by two votes, there is a possibility that these two people were inclined to vote PRO because he had a good sense of humor, while CON took the debate seriously. 2) A sense of humor can also distract a voter from that debater' http://www.debate.com/debates/A-debater-s-sense-of-humor-can-ultimately-affect-the-number-of-votes-that-debater-receives./1/comments/ 2008-05-13T16:14:31-08:00 Being Racist is okay http://www.debate.com/debates/Being-Racist-is-okay/1/ First i would like to say. Tell me why it is okay to hate other cultures and other poeple with different beliefs and skin color? http://www.debate.com/debates/Being-Racist-is-okay/1/comments/ 2008-05-14T16:02:32-08:00 Nepal Should Recieve Comprehensive Assistance for Its Children Over The Listed Nations Below http://www.debate.com/debates/Nepal-Should-Recieve-Comprehensive-Assistance-for-Its-Children-Over-The-Listed-Nations-Below/1/ Out of Bhutan, Indonesia, Myanmar, Nepal, Philippines, and Vietnam, I believe that Nepal should recieve assistance for its children. I have a school debate on this issue, and I was just looking for some points others may possibly bring up. :) I have come up with a few, but not many. Thanks so much! :) http://www.debate.com/debates/Nepal-Should-Recieve-Comprehensive-Assistance-for-Its-Children-Over-The-Listed-Nations-Below/1/comments/ 2008-05-14T13:24:55-08:00 THE SLAM BANK FORM OF CRICKET WITH ITS INDISCRIMINATE COMMERCIALIZATION http://www.debate.com/debates/THE-SLAM-BANK-FORM-OF-CRICKET-WITH-ITS-INDISCRIMINATE-COMMERCIALIZATION/1/ THE SLAM BANK FORM OF CRICKET WITH ITS INDISCRIMINATE COMMERCIALIZATION IS RUINING THE VERY FOUNDATION OF THE GAME http://www.debate.com/debates/THE-SLAM-BANK-FORM-OF-CRICKET-WITH-ITS-INDISCRIMINATE-COMMERCIALIZATION/1/comments/ 2008-04-30T19:39:44-08:00 Brittney Spears is a nice person and we should make her the president of the USA. http://www.debate.com/debates/Brittney-Spears-is-a-nice-person-and-we-should-make-her-the-president-of-the-USA./1/ I love Brittney. If you disagree, you should be stabbed, shot, and dismembered of all of your limbs. Brittney is a role model, and we should give way to her ways of trashiness. We all should vote her into power because she is a great mother, and is gorgeous. Thank you. http://www.debate.com/debates/Brittney-Spears-is-a-nice-person-and-we-should-make-her-the-president-of-the-USA./1/comments/ 2008-05-04T09:01:04-08:00 Fox News is not only Bias, but Deceitful http://www.debate.com/debates/Fox-News-is-not-only-Bias-but-Deceitful/1/ deceitful: having a tendency or disposition to deceive: a: not honest, b: deceptive, misleading (http://www.merriam-webster.com/) I hope that whoever accepts this debate will accept the fact that Fox News is bias to the right-wing. This debate is not about MSNBC, CNN, ABC, ect. Fox is the network on trial here, and I wish to refrain from bringing in other networks to this discussion. This debate is only seeking an answer to the question "Is Fox News a deceitful source for 'news'?" To start off, I will assume my opponent recognizes that Fox news is in fact bias, so my first example of deceit will be the very slogan of Fox News itself: Fair and Balanced. How can a bias news network actually tell their viewers that their news is totally fair. Balanced? Fox News gives both sides to every issue; George Bushs' and Dick Cheneys'. You can fair and biased at the same time. Imagine if Air Americas slogan was: Non partisan Talk and Both-Sided Hosts. http://www.debate.com/debates/Fox-News-is-not-only-Bias-but-Deceitful/1/comments/ 2008-04-14T14:19:15-08:00 indo us nuclear deal http://www.debate.com/debates/indo-us-nuclear-deal/1/ well this debate will really help every one out to check the calliber and to pusude their efficiency across the world and foray the fields that we wanted to and forge ahead be it enterpunuership be it armed forces be it politics it aslo gives everyone a platform to voice their choices and opinion and makes us strong independent that we are today http://www.debate.com/debates/indo-us-nuclear-deal/1/comments/ 2008-04-11T22:02:13-08:00 Public bathrooms http://www.debate.com/debates/Public-bathrooms/1/ Pooping in public is bad form. When someone poops their pants, or drops their drawers in the middle of a crowd and pokes the turtle head, it is not socially acceptable behavior. Who dares to oppose this position? Harumph! Harumph, I say! http://www.debate.com/debates/Public-bathrooms/1/comments/ 2008-04-06T17:54:39-08:00 Deport Illegal Immigrants who have Committed a Crime in the US? http://www.debate.com/debates/Deport-Illegal-Immigrants-who-have-Committed-a-Crime-in-the-US/1/ I am for this because people in our country who have done something illegal should absolutely be returned to there home country and be prosecuted there. I believe this would be good so that we could lower the population in our jails and also keep illegalise out! http://www.debate.com/debates/Deport-Illegal-Immigrants-who-have-Committed-a-Crime-in-the-US/1/comments/ 2008-03-25T18:10:14-08:00